| Reprinted from the
Santa
Cruz Sentinel of June 18, 2000,
Santa
Cruz,
California, USA:
A home should be an inalienable right
by Nancy Huntting
I just read
"Middle-class buyers
qualify for subsidies" (Sentinel, June 11) and also "Furious Debate
Rages
on Sleeping in Public," (The New York Times 5/28) which tells of
Santa Cruz as well as other cities across the country having hundreds,
sometimes thousands of men, women, and children who don't have a place
to sleep at night. More and more Americans - despite massive falsity
about
this in the press and government - cannot afford rent. The National
Coalition
for the Homeless reports that homelessness has doubled and even tripled
in the last two decades. That people are homeless in the United States
of America is a horror, an outrage -- and I respect every person
working
to have this horror end.
The Sentinel article
said "homelessness
looms even for those with jobs," telling of a single parent of two
children,
working full time, who "the region's housing crisis has left...
homeless
for four months." The Times article tells that in the safe sleeping
zones
just voted on by the [Santa Cruz] City Council "structures, tents, or
other
camping accessories like stoves would ...be illegal. People would not
be
allowed within 300 feet of any home. And after three nights... would
have
to move to another spot at least 500 feet away." Every man, woman, and
child who has to lay his or head down on a sidewalk is flesh and blood,
has a mind, feelings, hopes and fears that are real; each has
possibilities
that are being stifled. And when you lose a job, or work long hours and
still can't make ends meet, you not only are not free, you are also in
great danger. The Times article says, "recent studies showed that
homeless
people are 4 to 12 times more likely than housed people to be the
victims
of attacks."
Meanwhile, what these
articles don't
deal with is the reason why, in a land so wealthy, in an economy
supposedly
doing so well, there are thousands of people -- many of them families
with
young children -- without a basic necessity of life, a home!
I want your readers
to know there
is an answer. It was given by the American economist and critic Eli
Siegel,
the founder of the education Aesthetic Realism. He is the person who
had
the greatest knowledge of history and the greatest compassion for
people.
He said that any economy in which one child is hungry is a failure. He
showed, beginning in 1970, that our economic system, in which a few
owners
and stockholders make profit from the labor and life needs of others,
had
irreparably failed, would never recover; the contempt for people at its
basis had at last shown itself to be so inefficient it could no longer
work. Siegel defined contempt as "the addition to self through the
lessening
of something else." And he also explained so importantly: "If people
really
cared that poverty not be, it wouldn't be. But once you can feel you're
superior by thinking others are poorer than you are, it will be."
The idea that people
can't have a
decent place to live unless someone can make profit from them is
immoral.
Recently, I attended an event that should have been reported on the
front
pages of every major newspaper: a seminar titled "Housing:
A Basic Right, An Urgent Need, an Architectural Priority" at the
American
Institute of Architects national convention in Philadelphia. It
featured
the powerful public service film against homelessness and hunger "What
Does a Person Deserve?" by Emmy award winning filmmaker Ken Kimmelman,
based on this fundamental ethical question asked by Eli Siegel: "What
does
a person deserve by being alive?"
The honest answering
of this question
by everyone -- every city council member, mayor, and government
official
in every city in America -- will end homelessness. That film ends with
these words by Siegel: "The world should be owned by the people living
in it. Every person should be seen as living in a world truly his. All
persons should be seen as living in a world truly theirs."
NancyHuntting is a
writer and
teacher at the nonprofit AestheticRealism Foundation in New York City:
www.AestheticRealism.org.
|